Disney’s Creativity Is Tangled

Jeff Polizzi says:

My compliments to Cybergosh, “THANK YOU!” I have a message for him: I find that title, “Tangled,” disrespectful to not only the Grimm Brother’s title, but to Walt Disney as well. Because that is not what Walt Disney would do when he adapts fairy tales into animated movies. Those people, who complain about story titles being too girlish, need to understand that those story titles being too girlish happens to be written by MEN before we are even born. Also, they need to understand that they do not write stories just for girls or boys, they write for families to enjoy, learn, and love. I even love the title logo that Disney created for “Rapunzel,” and now they want to change it to “Tangled?” That title does not make any sense, and it is misleading. If they ever do change the title from “Rapunzel” to “Tangled,” I would find Disney’s next CG movie a flop. But, if they leave the title, “Rapunzel,” the way it is, and the title logo that Disney created, then I would have high confidence that Disney’s next CG movie could be a huge success. So I say to Disney, “I demand that you change that dreadful title back to “Rapunzel” at once, or else you will all become a disgrace to Walt Disney forever. And you will fall to DreamWorks Animation forever more.” Those boys need to, “Dig a Little Deeper (according to the song from, “The Princess and the Frog”),” on the synopsis than believing that the next fairy tale with the girlish title would be girlish. To my belief, Disney changes the synopsis on every fairy tale to make it more interesting than typical. I wish I could do the same thing WITHOUT changing the title, UNLESS if the title does not make any sense or it is not that catchy.