New Harry Potter Won’t Be A New York Times Best-Seller
And here’s why:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/michael-giltz/why-harry-potter_b_57099.html
UPDATE: if that link doesn’t work, try the cached version by clicking HERE.
Author
PIECE BY PIECE - 11"x17" Original Promo Movie Poster 2024 Pharrell Williams
$19.99 (as of December 24, 2024 08:41 GMT -08:00 - More infoProduct prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on [relevant Amazon Site(s), as applicable] at the time of purchase will apply to the purchase of this product.)
Star Wars: Battle of Jakku-Republic Under Siege #1 VF/NM ; Marvel comic book | 1/4/1900
(as of December 23, 2024 08:40 GMT -08:00 - More infoProduct prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on [relevant Amazon Site(s), as applicable] at the time of purchase will apply to the purchase of this product.)
OpenCritic
been removed
i added the link to the GOogle cached version. interesting article about the NYT classifying the Potter series as “children’s books” and therefore ineligible, and the impact that would have had if that were true years ago (on His Dark Materials, Bridge to Terabithia, and Harry Potter himself).