New Harry Potter Won’t Be A New York Times Best-Seller
And here’s why:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/michael-giltz/why-harry-potter_b_57099.html
UPDATE: if that link doesn’t work, try the cached version by clicking HERE.
Amazon Basics Neoprene Dumbbell Hand Weights
$21.99 (as of April 3, 2025 09:38 GMT -07:00 - More info)JXJMYU 100pcs Tayloris Music Sticker for Adult, Female Pop Singer Ablum Stickers for Teen Girl, Waterproof Vinyl Sticker for Water Bottle Laptop Phone Party Favors
$9.99 (as of April 3, 2025 09:38 GMT -07:00 - More info)Forgotten Home Apothecary : 250 Powerful Remedies at Your Fingertips
$37.00 (as of April 3, 2025 09:38 GMT -07:00 - More info)Auto Amazon Links: No products found. (69 items filtered out)
been removed
i added the link to the GOogle cached version. interesting article about the NYT classifying the Potter series as “children’s books” and therefore ineligible, and the impact that would have had if that were true years ago (on His Dark Materials, Bridge to Terabithia, and Harry Potter himself).